The former anointed appointed might have a point regarding their observations if:
a) they remembered that during their dismal misrule the books were NOT open for anyone to inspect (a violation of the UPR they hold dear); this Parish Council has had them open for inspection at anytime by any parishioner. In addition, upon inspection by the anointed appointed, they themselves found no improprieties.
b) while decrying audits of benevolent funds [which do fall under the purview of GAAP Accounting Standards under rule 501(c)(3) regardless of UPR paranoia] they fail to note that there were improprieties; these are not "discretionary" funds to be used by the esteemed clergy for their family or individuals who are themselves signatories on the accounts they espouse untouchable.
c) their claims for "unity", and adherence to the UPRs, ring hollow in view of their ongoing justification of a separate corporate identity for Prophet Elias only by a self elected, unauthorized group of parishioners;
d) they applied the dearly held UPR uniformly during their misrule
Saturday, November 9, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment